Republican Senator Lindsey Graham has heavily criticized Pakistan’s potential role as a mediator between the United States and Iran, labeling the country’s involvement “more than problematic.” His remarks follow public opposition from Pakistani officials regarding the country joining the Abraham Accords.
The Core Issues
-
The Abraham Accords Ultimatum: Senator Graham urged Pakistan to directly respond to US President Donald Trump’s call for regional mediators to join the Abraham Accords—a framework established to normalize diplomatic, economic, and security ties between Israel and Arab/Muslim-majority nations.
-
Pakistan’s Defiant Stance: The friction intensified after comments from Pakistan’s Defence Minister, Khwaja Asif, who explicitly stated he does not support Islamabad joining the accords. Asif reiterated Pakistan’s historic geopolitical stance: Islamabad will not recognize Israel until an independent Palestinian state is established based on pre-1967 borders, with East Jerusalem as its capital.
-
Military Concerns: Raising pressure on Islamabad, Graham highlighted serious security concerns, asserting it is “undeniable” that Iranian military aircraft have been housed on Pakistani airbases.
Senator Graham’s Reaction
Responding to the Defence Minister’s stance on social media, the South Carolina Senator expressed deep skepticism about Pakistan’s ability to act as a neutral party.
Senator Lindsey Graham on X: “It has been apparent to me for quite a while that Pakistan as a mediator is more than problematic. Their animosity towards Israel is long standing… As to the defence minister’s comments about the Abraham Accords, saying that Pakistan would never join because they don’t trust Israel: The clip may be a year old, but I fear the sentiment is fresh.”
Graham concluded by warning that past rhetoric from high-ranking Pakistani officials against Israel remains deeply disturbing to US interests, making Pakistan’s position as a diplomatic bridge highly questionable.

